Women and art

Measuring equality in the art world.

Wetlands

leave a comment »

There are no taboos in Charlotte Roche’s book Wetlands. Everything’s allowed and the more disgusting it is the better. At least according to the main character Helen. I’m halfway through the book now and I find it fascinating, repulsive and absolutly brilliant.

Helen is in hospital after an anal surgery and while she’s recovering she leads us through her weird mind and memories. There are chapter long descriptions of her body and bodily fluids. She likes tasting and smelling everything that comes out of her body. She’s a regular at a brothel. She’s into avocado pits. She’s only 18.

At times Wetlands can be erotic but the detailed way that Helen describes everything makes it more disgusting and also funny.
I find the book liberating. A nice change from all the “dirty” minds of male characters. I bet a lot of people haven’t managed to finish this book. Sometimes in the middle of some of her toilet routine descriptions I look away in disgust. But I still continue reading. Wetlands is one of a kind and an absolutly hilarious read.

Read this article with Charlotte Roche in the Guardian.

This is a great quote from that article: “Men think they can be disgusting and sexual and stuff, and now I’ve shown them that women can do the same. When I walk into a pub now, and I see men saying, ‘Look, that’s Charlotte Roche’, it’s as if I’ve stolen something from them. I like that feeling.”

(Click on the picture to return to its original URL)

Advertisements

Written by womenandart

November 12, 2009 at 7:43 pm

Posted in Writers

Tagged with , ,

Elles@pompidou

with one comment

I will be very sad if I don’t get the chance to go to Paris and see the elles@pompidou exhibition before it ends in May next year. The Pomidou is exhibiting 500 works by 200 women artists.

Written by womenandart

November 10, 2009 at 4:31 pm

Posted in Exhibitions

Tagged with , ,

The Bauhaus Women

leave a comment »

In the Observer magazine on Saturday Jonathan Glancey wrote an article about Bauhaus art school. The school opened in 1919 and both women and men were free to join classes. Even though the intention of the school was equality between the sexes that was never really the case. The women were mostly only allowed to do weaving while the men attended painting and carving classes. Even though many of the female students were forgotten about Ulrike Muller has written a book called Bauhaus Women which is about the all the talented women who thrived at Bauhaus art school.

(Click on the image to return to its original URL)

Written by womenandart

November 9, 2009 at 5:27 pm

Famous female artists

leave a comment »

Written by womenandart

November 5, 2009 at 3:33 pm

Posted in Painters

Female artists vs. male artists

leave a comment »

After more research on the subject female artists vs male artists I’m beginning to realise that it is much more complex then just the media ignoring female artists. Some people argue that women are just not as good artists as men, the art critic Brian Sewell for example was quoted in this article by Andrew Johnson in the Independent online claiming that “there has never been a first-rank woman artist,” which I believe is simplifying the issue. Until quite recently women were seen as second-rank human beings which of course would affect the way people view their art.

Many of the great male artists are not just admired for their art but also for their status and their eccentric ways. The life they lived, and were allowed to lead, helped create the mystery around them and their art. Look at Warhol for example or Picasso, how many women at the time do you think would have the courage to live the way they did? And if they did live that life they would most likely not be looked upon the same way as a man would. This was of course even harder the further back in time we go. As a man you were free, you could travel and see the world but as a woman you often belonged to someone else from a young age.

Women are still in this day and age seen as a bit weird if they don’t want to have children, we feel sorry for them, while a childless man is more seen as a free spirit, a wanderer. These characteristics normally go hand in hand with being an artist so if being that way is not accepted for women of course they will be regarded differently.

Not saying that you can’t be a great artist just because you have children but in a way freedom is very important in the creative process, you have to go deep inside yourself and if your the one who’s supposed to take care of the children, when will you find the time? Living in the time we do now many of us feel that men and women are nearly equal (which can be argued) but it is important to remember that this was not the case for the generation of our grandparents or even our parents.

There must have been many female Monet and Van Gogh who had to give up their dreams to live in their husband’s shadow. It is hard to change history though and evidently there aren’t for example as many female impressionists as male ones hence there won’t be as many paintings by female artists to exhibit.

Mr Sewell takes it has far as saying “Only men are capable of aesthetic greatness. Women make up 50 per cent or more of classes at art school. Yet they fade away in their late 20s or 30s. Maybe it’s something to do with bearing children.” Why would only men be capable of aesthetic greatness? Do men have an aesthetic greatness gene that women lack? That sounds very unlikely. One could wonder what Mr Sewell’s theory would be on why most great artists are white men.
Women can only have children until they are about 40 so yes perhaps a lot of women feel that they can’t live the life of an artist if they are going to be able to support and take care of a family. Men can live a vagabond life until they are 60 if they want and then decide to settle down and have a family. That is many more years of freedom. So if you are woman who hasn’t “made it” by the age of 30 perhaps you will chose another career path.

Still I feel like it would be simplyfing the matter if we only blamed it on having children. But that, together with how society expects a woman to be and act contributes to how we look at female artists and their art. Male artists seem to be allowed to more freely express their eccentricity which affects the way we see them and their art.
The art world reflects society and society is not yet equal. The reality is that men are more respected in most areas in life, something that will hopefully change with time. Have a look here to get an idea of how female artists are represented by the art world.
There are obviously many great female artists out there and my aim with this blog will now be to write about them.

Written by womenandart

November 5, 2009 at 3:22 pm

leave a comment »

I’m still measuring but just being a bit bad at updating my blog at the moment. Drowning in exams.

Written by womenandart

May 26, 2009 at 2:03 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Summary of the week

leave a comment »

week 11

Written by womenandart

May 17, 2009 at 7:48 pm

Posted in Uncategorized